Pages

Contact

Recent Posts

Archives

Recent Comments

BlogBurst.com

Categories

Links

Join My Community at MyBloglog!

Add to Technorati Favorites

Tracking Tourism: The Tourism Research Blog (Virtual) reporting on the PhoCusWright 2008 Conference

« WTM Report – How do you market travel to the Axis of Evil? Make it fun. Warning bells you can’t afford to ignore – courtesy of Google Insights »

Looking at the next big things in travel innovation and what they mean downstream.

Well, a week or so ago I was in London for World Travel Market. The following week I was supposed to be in Los Angeles as a guest of PhoCusWright for their 2008 Conference. Unfortunately, work here got in the way and so, instead of the sunny streets of Hollywood, I have been in Scotland instead.

However, from all accounts, the PhoCusWright Conference delivered its usual insight and I thought I would use this blog to highlight some posts from fellow bloggers and other online reports from the conference that caught my eye.

Before I do so, I should mention that I was fortunate to be a guest blogger at the Phocuswright Conference in Berlin earlier this year and so I’ll say a quick word about their conferences as background. For those of you who have been to one, you know what they’re like. But for those of you who haven’t and feel that the conferences that you are currently going to seem to have the same old people with the same of things to say, then I think the PCW conferences might be a nice surprise. I found the level of discussion there much higher and it struck me that this is the place to go to hear from the most senior people in the industry how the travel and tourism sector is progressing.

So, I’ll start with my impressions (second hand) of their Travel Innovation Summit which showcased before the main event solutions and innovations “that significantly impact travel planning, purchasing and trending.” The presentations can be found here and an overview (also second hand!) can be found on William Bakker of Tourism BC’s blog here.

I sense in William’s post a slight sense of being underwhelmed by what was on offer and that’s a sense I share (William, if I’ve got you wrong, let me know!). But, on reflection, I think that being underwhelmed is possibly not the appropriate description – most of the innovations are solid if unshowy examples of how people are exploring niches and looking for new opportunities. So instead of looking for something revolutionary, it is perhaps more appropriate to look at these products as evolutionary.

That said, some of the themes I picked up from the presentations were:

  • Consumer interfaces are increasingly trying to become more human – think visuals (TV especially)
  • User generated content continues to be key
  • Aggregation also remains key – whether that’s of UGC, fare data or a combination of the two and more.
  • There are niches to be explored – whether its for the smaller end of the market like Rezgo or for train travel, adventure holidays, or vacation rentals.

A first-hand overview of the ‘winners’ of the summit can be found in Jaime’s post here.

The Uptake Travel industry Blog has an excellent overview of the themes of the conference ‘proper’ here and they seem to reflect notions that I have come upon in different places on them same theme. In summary:

  • Look east for new customers (’cos it’s going to get a bit grim if you just rely on your usual markets…)
  • Travel is seems to be increasingly embracing TV images as part of the pre-booking experience
  • Mobiles really are finally becoming more significant to travel.

Interestingly on mobiles, a session I went to at WTM recently suggested that although mobiles are rising in importance, they are not yet being used for financial transactions in the travel industry but mostly in making the process of travel less painful (more destination info, barcode check-in, that kind of thing).

So, what do I make of all this? It seems that there is a greater air of caution for obvious reasons among travel innovators at the moment. The industry seems to be still changing quickly but it it seems more of a period of organic ‘natural’ evolution rather than left-field innovations suddenly seizing centre stage.

However, despite only experiencing PhoCusWright virtually, it seems to me that the innovators are still miles ahead of many of the players in markets closer to my home in Europe (I know, I know, there are exceptions, especially in London). What this surge of innovation says to me is that, even in this dark economic period, there are people out there thinking really creatively about how technology can make customers’ experiences better.

But I fear this is a spark that is still more conspicuous by its absence than presence in many areas. Despite the low and free cost of many of these technology services, I suspect too many people in the more local tourism sector will miss out.

I think the reason for this is that without exposure to the evolving technology in the context of its creators’ objectives – such as improved user experience, improved travel research processes, better customer experience through ease of booking – the ripple-out from the source gets more and more focussed on “must have” technology for the sake of it. In other words, the its reason for being gets forgotten and it moves from something that intelligently serves the customer to something that a site feels it ought to have but isn’t too sure why.

That risks leaving local tourism businesses continuing to try to play technology catch-up in the difficult years to come, rather than understanding the fundamental customer experience issues that technology was supposed to solve.

But if Web 2.0 has meant anything, it is that the technology exists to enable us to share and learn from each other, meaning that ignorance becomes more of a personal choice rather than an enforced state of affairs. The links in the post to PhoCusWright and associated commentary mean that you can experience these innovations in context and apply their insights and attitudes to your business.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 24th, 2008 at 10:09 pm and is filed under Conference learnings, Future trends, Opinion, Tourism blogging, Travel 2.0. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “(Virtual) reporting on the PhoCusWright 2008 Conference”

25th November, 2008 at 2:03 am

William Bakker

Just because I didn’t feel overwhelmed, that doesn’t mean these businesses can’t be successful by. Most explore something entirely new, found a new niche, or new business model for something that already existed. All very impressive.

Wandrian offers something new for example (online train booking). Is it innovative? Or is it something new (train) to an existing service (online booking)? Either way they can be very successful.

Problem I see with some other websites is that they offer a bunch of bundled technology that’s either nothing really new, or it’s a new feature with a website build around it, or it’s very complex to use.

Vibeagent is a good example from last year. Cool website. Very impressive technology. Nice people. But really just Kayak + Tripadvisor. So far it’s not really going anywhere. I’m still in their top 15 reviewers after a year and I also recognize a bunch of other travel bloggers in their top reviewers (http://www.vibeagent.com/community).

The first time I used Kayak, I had a ‘this will change everything’ moment. Same with Tripadvisor. Last year Farecast impressed me a lot. The closed I got to that this year (so far) was TripIt.

25th November, 2008 at 8:55 am

Stephen

Hi William

I’m glad I didn’t misinterpret you (too much).

I think we shared the recognition that there wasn’t a ‘this will change everything’ moment (this is the phrase I was looking for and failed to find when writing this post!) but rather, as you say, the potential for some of these products to develop a successful niche nevertheless.

I think the product that I most immediately ‘got’ at a consumer level was Triporati with its emphasis on being a ‘pre-click’ destination database – an obvious idea but this was the first one I’ve seen done that seemed to work for me.

And staying on that theme of search, I thought Rob Torres (Managing Director Travel, Google) comments interesting as well.

5th December, 2008 at 12:51 am

Phil Caines

Hi Stephen and William,

Wish you both could have been there to get a hands on impression of the innovation summit. I think the word evolution is an appropriate theme for the demos, as would ‘aggregation’.

Kayak really brought forth innovative travel booking aggregation, and now you can find it in different spaces and verticals (reviews, longtail product)

As far as where we can look for the next ‘wow’ change, I can only guess, but if you asked Joe Buhler, he would undoubtedly say “The semantic web of course!’, and I think he is right.

Hope to see you at ITB,
Phil

5th December, 2008 at 9:36 am

Stephen

Hi Phil

I hadn’t realized how frustrating it could be to describe a conference secondhand before I wrote this post – and I fear the outcome might be a bit like playing Chinese whispers! But it’s good to get the impressions of someone who was there to see whether we were picking up on the right messages.

I kind of agree about the semantic web but must confess I’m having a little difficulty getting my head around it at the moment.

My impression of the semantic web concept at the moment (beyond the merely technical) is that it will effectively be a method that allows for better, mutually understandable, databasing of online material to the point that you can start to integrate and contextualize information from multiple sites.

In other words, it will help you answer seemingly simple questions such as, “I don’t know when the Canucks are playing in Vancouver in late March, but I would like to book a flight under $500 (!) from Glasgow and hotel based around this” and not have to muck about looking on four different sites to find an answer.

Is this how you see it? Anything that helps me understand this better gratefully received!

25th March, 2009 at 12:53 pm

Poconos, PA spas

While PhocusWright does a decent job of showcasing innovation, behind the scenes it is the major players who set the tone. It is a very conservative bunch, in the industry for a long time and working for large and change averse companies.

That may be why the industry evolves quite slowly.

25th March, 2009 at 1:10 pm

Stephen

I think that’s an interesting point and one that we’ve come across in other sectors as well. Essentially, I think a lot of the innovations are not yet in a position to provide a benefit that is immediately apparent (or strong enough to dislodge an incumbent solution) and so the companies are cautious about implementing it.


Leave a Reply