Pages

Contact

Recent Posts

Archives

Recent Comments

BlogBurst.com

Categories

Links

Join My Community at MyBloglog!

Add to Technorati Favorites

Tracking Tourism: The Tourism Research Blog Travel 2.0 - the data, impacts and business implications

« Quick! Call the Police! Uncovering prejudice among your customers You are not the customer - its a mantra worth repeating »

There's no separating internet and travel

No longer can the Internet be viewed just as an add-on to marketing efforts - it is now an integral, critical part of travel distribution.

That was the view expressed by Diane Clarkson, Travel Industry Analysts at Jupiter Research and Bill Tancer, god of all things data at Hitwise, in this evening’s excellent webinar: Travel 2.0 Today, The Economy and the Evolving Travel Landscape.

More critically, Hitwise have found (through their clickstream analysis of internet users as they move from site to site) that traffic to the travel category of websites is actually increasing as people tighten their belts.

There has been no drop in travel website visits as fuel prices increase. People are instead researching their travel decisions more intensively online and are shifting to the online channel as they become more price sensitive.

Internet and online travel becomes more important in tough economic times.
Bill Tancer, Hitwise

Jupiter Research’s data backs this up. Their US Online Travel Consumer Survey from May ‘08 suggest that the next 12 months could see a sharp decline in travel frequency - with 39% of occasional leisure travellers and 43% of occaisional business travellers suggesting that they are planing fewer trips in the coming year. But the impact, Diane explains, is that “the Internet will increasingly become a tool as people research more intensely”.

The business implications of that are immense - while you may have cruised by on a sub-par website in good times, as things toughen up in the sector, people are looking at more websites and so it is critical you can attract and retain visitors on yours.

Bill and Diane’s webinar covered three key topics:

  • The impact on travel of the economic downturn
  • The impact of user generated content on travel brands and travel consumers
  • The potential for travel and social network sites.

They kindly gave permission for their content to be blogged openly, which is much appreciated as it is not always the case with such industry analyst briefings. When the webinar is available online, I will add the link as its really worth a listen. In the meantime here are a few of the conclusions from their respective research efforts that really tingled some brain cells for me:

1. User generated content is used by 40% of online travel researchers

Yup, 40%. Not hardly anyone, or a bunch of geeks, or a few back packing students - but 4 out of 10 of the people researching travel. Jupiter’s US Online Travel Consumer Survey from May ‘08 found that for this 40% using user generated content, ratings were the most popular (used by 58%), followed by reviews and recommendations (49%). Next came user generated photo content (18%) and friend’s social networking websites (18%). Other travellers blogs we consulted by 12% and user generated video by 5%.

The impacts of this? Diane cited the importance of using this content regularly and systematically as a source of competitor intelligence. And as the next point will illustrate, she also highlighted the importance for the contribution of travellers to be included as part of brand strategy. Why? Because user generated content is highly trusted.

2. User generated content is nearly twice as influential as brand to accommodation researchers

User generated content is far more influential than brand or the recommendations of friends and family

After price and location, for those using ugc, reviews/ratings from other travellers was the major influence in the decision making process. 36% named it as an influential factor in their decision, compared to 21% citing brand/reputation and 14% citing that old chestnut of family/friend recommendation. (Source Jupiter as above).

Hitwise’s clickstream data shows that visits to travel user generated content have increased 40% in the year since June 2007. They also reveal (perhaps no surprises) that it is TripAdivsor that is the heavyweight, accounting for more than 75% of the Travel UGC and 2.0 market share. (IgoUgo pales into second at 9.5% and WAYN at 8.4%). Bill made the point that while standalone Travel UGC accounts for only a small fraction of travel visits online (2%), its reach and impact is in fact much wider as people engage in user generated content on traditional travel websites.

3.The Travel 2.0 heavyweights are in the mainstream research to purchase mix

With a graph to die for, Bill combined the flow of clicks from travel site to travel site, with market share of those sites. From this network map, he isolated those sites that are driving traffic to the big OTAs such as Expedia, Orbitz and Travelocity.

And a few Travel 2.0 players are having a big impact - TripAdvisor and the metasearch site Kayak and Sidestep. Metasearch, sites that search for price across muliple agency and supplier sites, before sending the search off to another site to book, are faring particularly well in these price sensitive times. Two years ago they were only used by the highly tech savvy, whereas now they are entering the mainstream as people research more intensively for the best prices.

However, what Bill’s uber-graph also shows is that outside these heavyweights, the smaller Travel 2.0 sites (from WAYN to WikiTravel) are very insular, with little cross flow of traffic and are currently outside the mainstream travel research traffic flow.

4. The social networking sites are not impacting as a travel planning resource yet

Jupiter (same source as above) found that only 8% of those online travellers who are using social networking sites do so for travel planning. 56% do not use social networks in any capacity whatsoever that relates to travel. The most common travel related uses come in the form of communication, with 23% looking at friends travel photos or videos, 22% keeping in touch while away and 19% posting photos.

Diane contrasted the high level of trust that people have in stranger generated reviews, which comes from critical mass. People can sift many reviews looking for patterns and things that resonate with them. In contrast, social networks have much lower critical mass.

Hitwise’s data has not seen significant increases in traffic being referred to travel sites from social network sites - Bill suggested that where it is appearing, it is potentially being caused by people that use their social networking site as their homepage.

And different segments and demographic profiles of travel researchers behave in different ways. The 55+ age group are more likely to use newspapers and magazines to find a new travel site that they haven;t used before, whereas younger users are more likely to use meta search. Website visitors, like travellers, can never be thought of as a single homogeneous mass.

So, thanks again to Hitwise and Jupiter Research for a great webinar and for allowing us bloggers to share their findings with the wider industry. I hope I’ve communicated some of the potential power of their data with this short round up.

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 12th, 2008 at 9:53 pm and is filed under Data, Future trends, Internet usage statistics, Online customer behaviour, Tourism statistics, Travel 2.0. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 Responses to “Travel 2.0 - the data, impacts and business implications”

13th June, 2008 at 1:00 am

Jaime

Excellent overview. Thanks.

13th June, 2008 at 10:53 am

Sara

Thank you very much for this precious post!

It’s so hard nowadays to understand which channels are actually the right ones in order to plan and effetive promotion strategy for attracting the customers attention and convert them!
these data have provided me with an extremely useful insight!
thanks again,
Sara

14th June, 2008 at 9:07 am

Steve Ellwood

Interesting to see confirmed the relatively limited impact of social networking sites so far.

Detractors would say “But they’re still growing.”
To be met with the response “They’re pretty large already.”

Thanks.

15th June, 2008 at 8:02 am

Claude

Thanks for your post Vicky.

I don’t totaly agree with this views.

They are mainly focus on the mainstream travel research traffic flow.

But I can tell you, we can find some great niches with great conversion rate if you compare with Google adsense, Meta-search and other.

It’s work good as a mix for DMO’s and hotel.

About The social networking, I believe in the potential if you can have control on Database collect of your customers (ei : a DMO database) and data exchange with the travel social network database.

Strong emarketing and Travel 2.0 marketing need also strong know-how in database exchange…at the end it’s a powerfull interaction with the users

You make me think to blog about an other Webminar :
Yahoo!/Forrester/Compete, Inc. Workshop
2008 TravelCom Conference
Quantifying the Social Media Behavior of Online Travelers

I will try soon, I was job overbooked since 1 month !

If you want the power-point of this Webinar, send me a message on Twitter ;-)

Best regards from France.

BTW I will be at PhoCusWright in Hollywood Nov. 2008, and a pleasure to meet you again.

Claude

16th June, 2008 at 8:28 pm

Vicky

Firstly apologies to all four of you for my delay in responding to your comments - I was away for a long weekend and for some reason my Blackberry would not work with Wordpress!

Thanks for stopping by Jaime!

And thanks for your comments too Sara - indeed I think it is no wonder the web is regarded as a complex marketing channel, yet it suffers often from too much, not too little data!

Steve, you mention that it is interesting to see confirmed the relatively limited impact of social networking sites so far (at least in terms of travel planning). One of the things I also took from this is that it is mistake to simply bundle up “social media” together into a strategy - whereas in fact there are differences in effectiveness, uses and tactics say between travel UGC sites like tripadvisor, standard ugc like Flickr and lower personal network density sites like social networking sites. There is no one size fits all Web 2.0 strategy.

Claude thanks for your input and I will follow up with you on those slides. You’re right that this focussed on mainstream travel research planning flow, as opposed to niche activity. There was also actually a good discussion about search, I was holding it over for another post ;-) Especially as it relates to under utilisation of effective search marketing strategy.

I look forward to seeing you at PhoCusWright Claude (though I haven’t book a place yet!) and all the best with that project.

Apologies again to all of you for the delay in responding to your comments - it was not for want of trying!

27th June, 2008 at 10:51 am

jean

Some interesting figures. Thanks for sharing. I’m interested in the high percentage of UGC usage and low impact of social networking. However, in current travel UGC, I feel the travelers are more passionate to share their experience and knowledge than local people . Shouldn’t it be the locals who generally know more about the place they live?

27th June, 2008 at 11:03 am

Vicky

And also the locals who have the best insights perhaps?

I assume that is the philiosophy with: http://www.ourexplorer.com ?

I think that the popularity of travel UGC influence/adoption is that UGC is part of the travel experience. Just as we used to inflict our holiday snaps and videos on our friends and families, now we share them with extensive networks of people (strangers maybe, but perhaps more willing to listen?).

People relive, share and stimulate others by creating their travel UGC & that heightens & prolongs the travel experience.

I think locals may indeed the most knowledgeable, but that travellers are more often motivated to create the UGC content because its part of the trip. ( Flickr is perhaps an exception to this? It has massive local participation & content creation)

27th June, 2008 at 1:12 pm

jean

Yes Vicky, you are 100% right.

The travellers are more motivated to talk and share. Same as the case with myeslf when travelling back from some fresh/alien place. Keep talking and writing about it. I think what I share is the experience and feeling. Not necessarily the knowledge, e.g. history, culture, custom… The UGC are very helpful regarding hardwares - if a hotel is of good quality, if the staff are helpful, if a museum is worth seeing, if a restaurant offers wonderful foods… However, on “software” like local culture or living attitudes if someone wants to explore more, UGC might be limited.

But from the marketer’s point of view, your insights shared lead to more emphasis on UGC. “The clients have the say”, as mentioned in the other article here. : )

27th June, 2008 at 1:17 pm

Vicky

Indeed - the “don’t take my word for it” effect. Marketers can really utilise this - IF the product is working


Leave a Reply