Pages

Contact

Recent Posts

Archives

Recent Comments

BlogBurst.com

Categories

Links

Join My Community at MyBloglog!

Add to Technorati Favorites

Tracking Tourism: The Tourism Research Blog More Local, Less Convenient and Less Often - the Future of Travel and Tourism after Peak Oil?

« Want more gain and less pain from your online marketing? Watch your web visitors in action and be humbled »

Post Summary

The party could soon be over and Peak Oil could start to radically upset our current notions of travel and tourism. As costs rise, the world will become smaller again although there will nevertheless still be opportunities.

While the full impacts of global warming and their timings continue to be debated, the effects of a post-Peak Oil world are more certain and threaten to have deeper and more immediate impacts on the travel and tourism industry.

The idea behind this post then is twofold - 1) to determine whether I’ve got a little over-excited or whether this is a genuine problem and 2) assuming it to be an issue, what will be the effects?

What is Peak Oil?

The concept of peak oil is simple - there is a finite amount of oil in the ground and we have reached (or about to reach) the peak of the supply. Hereafter, there will increasingly be less oil to meet demand.

Arguably, fossil fuels and oil especially are the key to the modern world - they make nearly everything we take for granted possible - from mechanized travel through to abundant food, plastics, heating and most modern industrial processes. A world completely without oil is the childhood world of our grandparents - a world smaller and harsher in many respects.

I’ve raised the issue of peak oil with a number of knowledgeable energy industry people over the last few years and, to be honest, never received wholly comforting answers answers. The oil industry acknowledges that peak oil is an issue - we will start to run out of oil at some point. One industry insider told me that 2008 will be the first year when supply cannot meet global demand.

The best I’ve had by way of reassurance is , “Oh well, something will come along, it always does.”

So how will this affect tourism?

Oil Rig near InvernessThis isn’t just about the cost of travelling. The modern western agricultural model, for example, depends on fertilisers which heavily use oil in their preparation. Without them, crops will be less productive, meaning that food (whether animal or vegetable) becomes more expensive. By way of another example, think about plastic, another oil based product and just think how much in your house is plastic and how integral it is to modern life. Finally, if the cost of living rises, so do the wages needed to sustain employees. This list could go on but, in summary, nearly every aspect of our lives would become more expensive in a future where there is not enough oil to satisfy demand.

This will affect travel just as much as any other sector and here are a few thoughts on how this could affect the sector.

  • It puts a brake on tourism expansion

As costs start to rise, people’s ability to take more and longer holidays becomes constrained. Long haul destinations start to become luxuries instead of one choice among many.

  • People choose local

I recall that when I was young, my father told me that he had to wait until he was almost 20 before he got the opportunity to travel abroad - to France, some 100 miles from where he lived. I also recall how of all my school mates when I was young, only one came from a family rich enough to afford to fly overseas - and that was to Spain, incomparably exotic at the time but now just one choice among many. The rest of us had holidays that were more local and it seems to me that this will become more likely again.

Which is possibly good news for local destinations. Anyone who grew up in a coastal town in the UK is usually surrounded by the evidence of a once thriving holiday industry that went into severe decline when local people were no longer bound by economics in having to chose the British seaside over somewhere abroad. However, if the world becomes smaller again, these areas could see a renaissance in their fortunes.

  • Travel becomes less convenient

Expensive oil starts to make public transport a more appealing option - but this means that travelers will be more at the mercy of the timetables than they are presently. In the event that air travel became probitively expensive, then rail transport (in Europe anyway) could become the dominant means of long distance travel once again.

Europe still has a working legacy of good public transport (however frustrating it is in reality sometimes) - I fear that this is not the case in much of North America.

  • The Curse and Benefits of Petro Tourists - or how Canada can travel the world but become too expensive to visit

Of course, some areas will benefit in the short and medium term from oil shortages. These include primarily those countries with oil reserves and which will continue to suck in money from the rest of the world. At a geopolitical level this is a serious concern as many of the countries that stand to benefit the most are often the most unstable or are (potentially) inimical to the West’s current interests.

It also means that those petro-currency nations will become increasingly expensive to visit (think Norway already) but their citizens will enjoy higher standards of living compared to many other countries.

I suspect that Canada (whose oil reserves are second only to Saudi Arabia) will fall into this category - and I think the current strength of the Canadian Dollar vs the US Dollar is propelled as much by this as any mismanagement of the US financial system. I’m sure it’s great if you’re Canadian but, from a foreign travelers perspective, it’s already cheaper for me to visit the US if I’m prepared to substitute, say, Washington State for British Columbia.

But of course there will also be opportunities for non-oil nations that are seen as good value by travelers from the oil nations of Russia, Canada and (potentially) Venezuela, Nigeria and the Middle East. People in these areas will have money to burn and I’m sure some travel operators will become adept in helping them do that.

Suggested Links

James Howard Kunstler: The Long Emergency

Wikipedia:
Peak Oil

Lincoln University, New Zealand: “NZ Government acknowledges seriousness of tourism researcher’s ‘peak oil’ claims”

VisitScotland: Scenario Planning: What if the Oil Runs Out?

We’re all doomed!

My feeling is that tourism and travel will be very different in forty years time but that it will not necessarily have continued on the growth curve we are currently used to. I think there will be a slow contraction in some areas and the current model of of tourism with its opulent abundance of choice will increasingly be a luxury.

However, there will be opportunities as well as challenges but I would be really interested to her your views on what I have written.

I’m aware that when you make guesses about how the world will be in the future, you invariably fall flat on your face. But, rather like the mid-20th century idea that we would all travel around strapped to atomic jet pack by the turn of the century, these guesses are as interesting for the way they reveal contemporary thinking as for the quaintness of their vision. So, if what I have written in baloney, I’ll be glad to have a laugh about it with you in 30 year’s time over a glass of rare Himalayan whisky served by a floating robot waiter in a geo-stationary luxury resort 100 miles above Africa.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 19th, 2008 at 7:59 am and is filed under Future trends, Opinion, Peak Oil Travel. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “More Local, Less Convenient and Less Often - the Future of Travel and Tourism after Peak Oil?”

19th March, 2008 at 11:12 am

Nathan

Well… unless we reach the singularity before we reach peak oil I think you’re right to be concerned. And much as I like the idea of just ftp’ing myself to Australia, I’ve never taken Ray Kurzweil terribly seriously ;)

Eventually consumer behaviour in and media coverage of travel will realign themselves according to the new limitations. People’s wants are very much conditioned by what is available, so I think a big part of it is for how long the ‘memory’ of being able to travel farther persists.

It’s not exactly comparing like with like, but localism has become aspirational in food and hospitality (remember when it seemed exciting and sexy to shop in a supermarket?). Looking at how that happened might suggest a few coping strategies.

Nice post, by the way…

19th March, 2008 at 11:21 am

Stephen

Thanks Nathan.

I think that the ‘boiling a frog’ strategy to change is the most likely way that this will play out as you describe. People’s expectations will change imperceptibly and come into line with what they can afford without there being a revolution-inspiring rupture.

I also agree that localism, which is now a consumer choice, does present a possible coping strategy and I think this is one of the silver linings to the whole thing.

Not sure about the FTP business - I would be afraid of being hacked and being routed to work as a slave in a Russian crack den instead of my intended relaxing destination in the Bahamas…

19th March, 2008 at 3:31 pm

Ian Yeoman

Oil and energy are facilitating world inflation. But today, it is not like the 1970’s. The UK economy is not as dependent on oil as previous generations, because of efficiency measures or others types of energy. The world has continued to grow despite record oil prices, mainly because we have had the ability to absorb the cost. However, oil is the biggest cost for airlines rather than labour. High oil prices means more efficent aircraft both in energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Airlines are buying new aircraft because of this. By 2030, aircraft will reduce their C02 emissions by 50%. Higher oil prices means it is economic to invest in alternative fuel sources such as renewal energy or hydrogen. In the future, airlines will fly using GM biofuels - which don’t complete with the food chain.
Higher oil prices means more innovation and development. High oil prices means Scotland’s oil industry will last longer. Higher oil prices means we search for solutions and action change.

19th March, 2008 at 5:31 pm

William Bakker

Thanks for this uplifting piece Stephen. Although I agree with most of your assessment my hopes are also vested on the economic principle that when it becomes economically viable to switch to alternative (sustainable) sources of energy, a surge of innovation will fill the fossil fuel void.

In the meantime I would all come visit British Columbia before you can’t afford it anymore.

Cheers,

William

19th March, 2008 at 6:17 pm

Stephen

Thanks Ian for a note of optimism. I’m aware that in peak oil debates, there is a tendency to think the end is nigh and it’s useful to have a different view.

I think it is undoubtedly true that the market will come up with more efficient means of using fuel - European cars have always been a good example of the market responding to higher local energy prices than in the US in terms of their fuel efficiency.

I remain a little sceptical about the role of biofuels though and but recognise that these hold the key to a lot of the problems. My issue at the moment is that they need to be a hell of a lot more efficient than they presently are in order not to complete with the food chain.

The Scotsman reported recently that the burning of the biofuels in “specially-produced plants will begin in 2009 and, by 2013, [and] ScottishPower hopes they will have replaced five per cent of the coal they currently use. The firm said planting would have a minimal effect on land used for food crops. The project will use about 12 per cent of Scotland’s agricultural land - around 35,000 hectares.”

I appreciate that the laws of trade and comparative advantage come into play here (meaning that in a stable world we do not necessarily need agricultural land to fulfill our own fuel needs) but 12% of Scotland’s agricultural land to supply just 5% of the fuel at two of the six power stations dependent on fossil fuels strikes me as being quite high.

It also strikes me that if we are indeed absorbing the cost, doesn’t this mean that money we might have spent on one thing now gets diverted to covering fuel?

19th March, 2008 at 6:34 pm

Stephen

Hi William

I think you and Ian above are of a similar mind on this issue.

“In the meantime I would all come visit British Columbia before you can’t afford it anymore” - actually, I quite like the look of those jobs you got going at Tourism BC at the moment…!

(Note to current clients and business partners: I’m not really about to skip the country).

20th March, 2008 at 9:16 am

Karen Bryan

I started to focus on the UK. Scotland in particular in my travel website. This was partly because I thought as oil prices increased consumers would have to curtail trips overseas and I also wanted to highlight how much there is to do and see in the UK to move away from the mentality, “holiday=jump up plane”.

I’ve been amazed as I’ve travelled around Scotland, even in areas I thought I knew, by how many interesting things I’ve discovered.

I’m planning a Best of Britain off the beaten track blogging tour, so if anyone would like to be my guide to show me round the hidden gems in your locale or sponsor the tour please contact me.

I believe there needs to be more publicity promoting domestic tourism, making it more appealing to potential visitors rather than just a forced option because flights are too expensive.


Leave a Reply